Publication:
Could cholecystectomy be abandoned after removal of bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography?

dc.contributor.authorsKarpuz, Sakir; Attaallah, Wafi
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T09:51:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T19:19:41Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T09:51:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.description.abstractBackground/objective: The current treatment for choledocholithiasis is endoscopic common bile duct clearance followed by cholecystectomy. However, few studies have investigated whether cholecystectomy is necessary after the endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. This study aimed to determine the rate of patients without symptoms during the follow-up period after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP). Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent ERCP from a single centre.The patients were invited to the hospital for evaluation of symptoms during the follow-up period after ERCP. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the rate of patients with symptoms during the follow-up period after ERCP. Results: A total of 286 patients with a median age of 57 (18-95) years old were included in the study. Of these, 195patients (68%) remained asymptomatic during the follow-up period of 18 months (1-70) after endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy. A total of 75(50%) out of 151 patients who underwent cholecystectomy reported having symptoms after ERCP. In contrast, 119 (88%) out of 135 patients did not undergo cholecystectomy after the ERCP, remained asymptomatic during a median follow-up period of 43 months (11-70). The estimated 5-year asymptomatic rates of the patients after ERCP were 51% for the whole cohort (n = 286) according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusion: Majority of patients with choledocholithiasis who did not undergo cholecystectomy after ERCP were asymptomatic during the follow-up period. Thus, cholecystectomy may be unnecessary after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones within a midterm period. (C) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.01.013
dc.identifier.eissn0219-3108
dc.identifier.issn1015-9584
dc.identifier.pubmed33573924
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/243333
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000671920200001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
dc.relation.ispartofASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCommon bile duct stone
dc.subjectEndoscopic sphincterotomy
dc.subjectCholecystectomy
dc.subjectGALLBLADDER IN-SITU
dc.subjectLAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
dc.subjectSPHINCTEROTOMY
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectCALCULI
dc.titleCould cholecystectomy be abandoned after removal of bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage944
oaire.citation.issue7
oaire.citation.startPage939
oaire.citation.titleASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
oaire.citation.volume44

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
657.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format