Publication:
Evaluating the effects of different remineralization agents on initial enamel lesions in vitro

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorALKAN, ELİF
dc.contributor.authorYILMAZ ATALI, PINAR
dc.contributor.authorTAĞTEKİN, DİLEK
dc.contributor.authorsSARIALİOĞLU GÜNGÖR A., DALKILIÇ E., ALKAN E., YILMAZ ATALI P., TAĞTEKİN D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-28T12:59:26Z
dc.date.available2022-12-28T12:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-23
dc.description.abstractAim: Disruption of the demineralization–remineralization balance could activate the development of initial enamel lesions. Extrinsic assistance is needed to remineralize enamel lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efects of fuoride varnish, enamel matrix proteins derivative, and experimental bioactive glass (BAG) on remineralization of initial enamel lesions in vitro. Materials and Methods: Artifcial initial caries lesions were developed on ffty human enamel samples using demineralization solution (pH 4.5, 37°C, 96 hours). Samples were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=10): I-Fluoride varnish (Enamelast), II-Experimental BAG + 37% phosphoric acid (PA), III-Enamel matrix proteins derivative (EMPD, Emdogain) +Ethylenediamine-Tetraacetic-Acid (EDTA), IVEMPD+37% PA, V-Control (untreated). All remineralization agents were applied with pH cycling for 7 days. The samples were scanned by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline, demineralization, and after pH cycling. Lesion depths were measured using image analysis software (ImageJ). Lesions were evaluated using surface microhardness (SMH) and two fuorescence methods (FluoreCam® and DIAGNOdent Pen (DDPen)). The data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis, Friedman, and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). Results: According to OCT results, fuoride varnish was found to be the most efective agent in reducing lesion depth (p=0.005). Depending on SMH results, all agents increased the surface hardness values after pH cycling. No signifcant diference was found among fuoride varnish, BAG, and EMPD+PA groups. And these microhardness values were signifcantly higher than EMPD+EDTA and control groups (p<0.001). According to the DDPen score criteria, all groups showed lower scores compared with the control group (p<0.001), however, Clinical Oral Investigations (2022) 26:7299–7348 7317 1 3 no signifcant diference was found among the remineralization agent groups. In FluoreCam assessment, size and intensity values of all treated groups showed improvement. However, there was no signifcant diference between the treatment groups in terms of FluoreCam-size measurements (p=0.186). Conclusion: BAG and EMPD+PA has a remineralization capacity as much as fuoride varnish. EMPD+PA showed better microhardness and lesion intensity results than EMPD+EDTA.
dc.identifier.citationSARIALİOĞLU GÜNGÖR A., DALKILIÇ E., ALKAN E., YILMAZ ATALI P., TAĞTEKİN D., \"Evaluating the Effects of Different Remineralization Agents on Initial Enamel Lesions In Vitro\", 11th ConsEuro Congress, Antalya, Türkiye, 21 - 23 Nisan 2022, ss.19-20
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-022-04586-8
dc.identifier.startpage7317
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04586-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/284513
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartof11th ConsEuro Congress
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectDENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
dc.subjectCLINICAL MEDICINE
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (MED)
dc.subjectremineralization
dc.subjectbioactive glass
dc.subjectenamel matrix proteins
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomography
dc.subjectfuorescence
dc.titleEvaluating the effects of different remineralization agents on initial enamel lesions in vitro
dc.typeconferenceObject
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.idb971079e-49d4-454b-9bca-4eeb9e9f1d1e
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atPUBMED
local.indexed.atSCOPUS
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2d496767-3ac1-452c-b09c-fc744398c160
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa37cc65d-e64a-4410-8073-e72e27fbaecb
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdd30c5b5-8566-42e3-8ec7-94f6ed25fdcc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2d496767-3ac1-452c-b09c-fc744398c160

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
28.pdf
Size:
895.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Outputs